- #Bfg geforce 6200 driver windows xp drivers#
- #Bfg geforce 6200 driver windows xp series#
- #Bfg geforce 6200 driver windows xp free#
Personally, I didn't own such a new card at that time when I still had my Windows 98 machine, but I heard that users even with the Geforce 9 series had little/no problems (Need confirmation/backing up on this point) getting their cards to work with Windows 98.Evertek started with a small loan in 1990 and a lot of hopes and dreams. There was a ongoing project (Modified Nvidia 82.69 drivers) on this forum board to modify the last version of the Nvidia driver meant for Windows 9x to work with the newest line of Nvidia graphics cards. I think that the thread OP was looking for a graphics card that could play "modern" games that need a slightly newer graphics card model compared to the one he's using now.Įdit: I think that I should also suggest that the thread OP should also try Nvidia cards
#Bfg geforce 6200 driver windows xp drivers#
Unfortunately, it lacks hardware T&L (Nor were it's drivers fully Directx 9.0 compliant).Īlthough it's general 2D graphics performance wasn't too bad, it really can't play new games (My games bought from 2003 onwards were mostly unplayable/playable with poor graphics performance). I used to have (and used) that card before: A Matrox Millenium G400 with 32MB of VRAM. This card: Matrox Millennium G400 / Matrox Millennium G400 MAX has drivers from Win 98 up to Win server 2003 and Linux 32 and 64 bits!
If you had a single monitor with 2 inputs, you could connect input-1 to the AGP card and input-2 to the PCIe card.
You might be able to put both a PCIe and AGP card on this board, and under win-98 use just the AGP card, but both cards would be available under XP. The Intel version is socket 775, and they have both AGP and PCIe slots. These boards came out about 3 years ago, and they might still be available. If you really are motivated enough to run your XP side with a more advanced card, consider the Asrock Dual or Quad-core VSTA motherboard. The Nvidia 6200 (or maybe some higher 6x00 version) is likely the most advanced Nvidia card that you'll likely get running under win-98. My systems used ATI cards up until maybe 2002 or 2003, but I wasn't happy with the stability of these cards (or their drivers) so I switched to Nvidia.
#Bfg geforce 6200 driver windows xp free#
It has to be an AGP card though, as my 2003 motherboard has no PCI-E slot, and not even any free normal PCI slots! Edited Jby sp193Īs you can see from my signature, I have a dual boot system with XP and 98SE. Perhaps some of you could modify the inf of a older Catalyst driver to make it work with the newer graphics card? From what I know, these drivers are "unified" - meaning that they are designed to work on many hardware versions (Even newer ones that still follow it's standard). My father's Sony Vaio (With a modified Nvidia 8400M) also faced something similar. My new laptop - a Compaq CQ40-538TX has a Nvidia 103M graphics card (Unlisted by Nvidia, and the generic drivers refuse to install). Of course, I did something slightly different, but also involved getting drivers to work on "Unsupported hardware". and it worked with my card (Fully working, all resolutions/modes functional). I found an older driver that supported Windows 98 (Can't remember which ATI Radeon card it was for). I had installed Windows 98 SE on a Compaq Presario 2837AP laptop, and it had ATI Mobility Radeon 9500 which was supposed to be unsupported by Windows 98 (According to Compaq and ATI). I think that I should share something interesting - I once had faced something similar. In theory, you could hack drivers for Windows XP/2000 - they use WDM model driver which is supported by Win98/ME.īut as I presume, it's more than difficult.Īs to your question: if your motherboard supports AGP 2.0 (mode 4x) you can put a card from X800 family as the strongest on the ATI side.įrom Nvidia, it would be a GeForce 7 family. Second problem, it is of course, lack of drivers. In fact, I don't even know if it's possible to run PCI-E graphic card with 256 MB on those systems. Theoretically, I'm in a better position than you because I have a PCI-E slot on my motherbord.īut we will face two major problems: first, you can't buy a new graphic card equipped with less than 512 MB of graphic memory (not resolved issue on Win98/ME). Dave-H, same as you, I'd like to replace my old Radeon 9700 (if I remember correctly, bought in 2003).
0 kommentar(er)
